twincitystories.com Blog

Minnesota erotic entertainer: Candy

(612) 990-3872

Minneapolis erotic entertainer: Kionna

Another TGTBT!

Lots of very enticing offers of massage showing up on backpage, like this chick, and you wonder if this just might be the real girl and you are too disillusioned to believe otherwise and end up missing out on a chick with just the right assets to rock you fucking world. Perhaps her.

I remember several months ago, there was this scorchingly hot black chick that came thru the TwinCities, advertising first on TER, then later, on backpage too. And if you had not seen her ad on TER, you probably would have seen the backpage ad and went, ” Sure, this girl is gonna be the girl I see. Sure.”

Well, you would have missed out my friend, because the girl who answered the door, would have been the exact same girl in the ad.

Curses!

A face only a mother could love

Minneapolis high priced massage

Click for the enticement

Minneapolis erotic entertainer: Kelly

(612) 298-1236

End piracy, not liberty

Click to take action!

Minneapolis erotic entertainment: 1/17/12

Click for the intro

Minneapolis erotic entertainer: Molly

No phone, only email?? hmm...

backpage fake artist: Breeana

You make the call.

True

False

And another one bites the dust. I knew I had seen this pic somewhere before. The hips on the bottom pic are a lot slimmer, but  look at everything else, the swimsuit itself, the pink wall in the background, the mural to her left, everything else is identical.

I am getting so tempted to do a video exposure of some of these fake picture scam artists. Set up a meeting and video tape them walking in. I would have a printed copy of her ad and defy her on camera to prove that the girl in the pic is her.

Not sure if it would be legal, but it sure would be a lot of fun!

Click the pics for the real and the fake.

Minnesota erotic entertainer: Dior

(404) 931-0211

Escorts who hate reviews

tits and sass is a sex worker produced blog with a HEAVY slant towards it’s sex worker target audience. Pose a question as a male (mark, trick, client, time waster) and you’re liable to get jumped on by a host of writers with names like strawberry and dior and dimilo.

Still it’s interesting reading to get an idea of how the other side thinks. This week they take to task the culture of hobbyists and their worship of the review. If you are of the TER VIP status with triple digit reviews on your record, maybe you should not read the story. Definitely ego deflating. Words like disgusting, review trolls, and misogynistic, pretty much tell you their feelings about being reviewed.

What’s funny in a sad kind of way is how these ladies always seem to not have a problem unloading on the very guys who keep their bills paid, yet always never admitting their part in the booty process. It takes two to tango. You really have no justification to call a guy a pervert because he wants to piss on you for cash, when you are the one accepting the piss and the cash!

One of the most strident harridans mentions that she finds the reviews misogynistic in their treatment of women. Yet I would bet she finds nothing wrong with her battle axe sisters writing about a session and how disgusted they were with the client but kept smiling because they were thinking about the bills that would be paid with the session tab.

That’d how it runs in estrogenworld.com.

We are not allowed to demean them as sex objects, but it’s perfectly ok to demean us as cash objects.

All I can think of after reading this crap, is Bravo to the internet as the great equalizer, and